See All Resources
Every Learner Everywhere
Online Learning Consortium
Part of
Pillar Resources Pillar Resource

Faculty Development and Gen AI Playbook

Created By:
Every Learner Everywhere® in partnership with The Online Learning Consortium October 2025
Four faculty members at conference table with laptop engaged in faculty development.
Topic: Effective Teaching Practices Evidence-based Teaching Practices Faculty Preparedness Professional Development Student and Faculty Experience Student Experience
Role: Administrators Faculty Instructional Support Staff
Institution: 2-Year Institutions 4-Year Institutions

Evidence-based Best Practices

Faculty development is a critical lever for enhancing teaching and learning in today’s higher education landscape. This playbook provides strategies to Faculty Development practitioners in Centers of Teaching and Learning (CTL) to develop effective and valuable programming around GenAI. Grounded in research, the playbook is designed to guide faculty development professionals in colleges, universities, and other higher education organizations to develop and implement GenAI professional development opportunities for faculty and staff.

To explore and evaluate the strategies, challenges, and resources employed by CTLs in higher education institutions across the United States in response to the rapid emergence of GenAI technologies in academic settings, OLC researchers conducted a mixed-methods study. By conducting a comprehensive survey followed by in-depth interviews with CTL leaders and directors, this research sought to provide a nuanced understanding of the current landscape of GenAI integration in higher education and to identify best practices and future directions for supporting faculty in this evolving educational environment.

Key findings include:

  • Widespread Acknowledgement of GenAI’s Permanence: Across the dataset, both survey and interview respondents expressed strong consensus that GenAI is here to stay.
  • Diverse and Evolving Faculty Development Models: Most CTLs offer multi-pronged approaches: webinars, book clubs, microcredentials, modular courses, and department-specific consultations.
  • Pragmatic Faculty Engagement with Nuanced Resistance: Barriers to engagement include time constraints, lack of institutional incentives, and emotional/ethical tensions surrounding AI.
  • Policy Approaches: Decentralized but Guided: Institutions generally avoid rigid, centralized policies in favor of guidance frameworks, such as the “traffic light” (Red/Yellow/Green) model.
  • Positive and Negative Pedagogical Impacts: Positive uses include brainstorming, assignment revision, generating feedback, and simulating case scenarios.
  • Resource Limitations and Structural Challenges: Most programs operate with limited staffing, budgets, and incentives. Common CTL sentiments include being under-resourced and over-extended.
  • Future Directions: Embedded AI Literacy and Scalable Infrastructure: Programs emphasize the need for agility — short-term planning cycles, rapid iteration, and ongoing environmental scanning.
Download the Faculty Development and GenAI Playbook

Recommended Citation:

Lewis Miller, C., Barth, D., Gay, K., Scherer, F. & Herron, J. (2025). Faculty Development and GenAI Playbook: Evidence-based Best Practices. The Online Learning Consortium.

Other Related Resources

Pillar Resource

The Career Readiness Imperative in Gateway Courses

Three college students walk on a campus path in front of a brick building, one in casual attire with a tablet, another in a suit with a backpack, and the third in military uniform carrying a folder. Image depicts the career readiness imperative.

April 2026

This resource examines the growing trend of U.S. colleges and universities integrating career readiness into academic courses, with particular attention to gateway and general education courses early in degree programs. It focuses on how students experience the relevance of what they learn in these early courses, and it provides strategies institutions can use to help students experience that relevance earlier, more explicitly, and more consistently.

More

Course Design for Student Success Rubric

Resource Cover page from The IIRP Graduate School's Course Design for Student Success Rubric with title, photo of student holding tablet and org logos.

March 2026

The IIRP Graduate School’s Course Design for Student Success Rubric, is a robust rubric, designed to support student engagement, access, and success across varied learner populations and institutions, including undergraduate, graduate, 2-year, etc. We want to inspire faculty, instructional designers, and administrators along their path of continual improvement.

More
Pillar Resource

Student Research Into How Students and Faculty Use AI

COVER page of Student Research Into How Students and Faculty Use AI- Insights for Teaching and Learning with title and photo and every learner everywhere logo.

January 2026

This report offers a student-centered examination of generative AI in higher education—not a guide or endorsement, but a record of genuine student inquiry into AI’s potential and limitations. Students are already using AI, regardless of institutional policies. This student research helps faculty understand not just what tools students are using, but how they’re thinking about AI’s role in their education.

More
See All Resources